La Jornada: WorldMeets.Us Translation by Gemma Bouchereau
See Spanish Original.
“It is deplorable, but indicative of the contemporary world disorder, that Swedish legal officials have been suborned to invent allegations of sex crimes in the context of what has been exposed as a Washington revenge and damage control operation, as well as an attempt to suppress transparency, freedom of expression and the release of information carried out by the Australian and his organization.”
EDITORIAL
The unexpected appearance of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at the Ecuador Embassy in London, his formal request to the Andean country for political asylum, and Quito’s offer to evaluate the request based on the principles of international law and the country’s political tradition of protecting human rights, has dispelled fears that the Australian journalist would be handed over to Sweden in the next few days. It is in Sweden that he faces charges of alleged sexual harassment and rape, which seem a fait accompli given the refusal of the British Supreme Court to reopen the case last week.
Whatever response the Rafael Correa government gives Assange, the existence of a political refugee in contemporary Europe, the legal fury being directed against him by the authorities of two Old World countries, England and Sweden, and the silence of the Western powers in regard to this situation, demonstrates the hypocrisy and moral and political bankruptcy of governments that repeatedly claim to be champions of freedom, transparency, legality and respect for human rights, but instead act as advocates of authoritarianism, defenders of opacity, partisans of the reactionary use of law and the disregard of individual rights. Read more.
The MexicoBlog of the Americas Program, a fiscally sponsored program of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), is written by Laura Carlsen. I monitor and analyze international press on Mexico, with a focus on security, immigration, human rights and social movements for peace and justice, from a feminist perspective. And sometimes I simply muse.
Showing posts with label G20. Show all posts
Showing posts with label G20. Show all posts
Jun 20, 2012
Violence puts Mexico among worst G20 countries for women
TrustLaw (A Thomas Reuters Foundation Service): LONDON, June 13 - Physical and sexual violence, a culture of male chauvinism, drug-related crime and poor access to healthcare in rural areas mean Mexico is among the worst places to be a woman out of the world’s most industrialised nations, a Thomson Reuters Foundation global survey of experts found on Wednesday.
Mexico polled 15th out of 19 countries in the Group of 20 most developed states, excluding the European Union economic grouping. India was ranked the worst place for women to live while Canada was the best, according to the perceptions of 370 gender specialists questioned by TrustLaw, a legal news service run by Thomson Reuters Foundation. Read more.
Mexico polled 15th out of 19 countries in the Group of 20 most developed states, excluding the European Union economic grouping. India was ranked the worst place for women to live while Canada was the best, according to the perceptions of 370 gender specialists questioned by TrustLaw, a legal news service run by Thomson Reuters Foundation. Read more.
World leaders at G-20 summit in Mexico weigh stimulus vs. austerity in debate to rescue Europe
AP: LOS CABOS, Mexico — With major European economies on the brink of collapse, leaders concluding an annual Group of 20 meeting sought Tuesday to reassure the world that they would find a way to put out the debt-fueled economic wildfire that has threatened banks, wiped out jobs and toppled governments across the continent.
But the presidents and prime ministers gathered in this seaside resort seemed content to delay any major decisions for a while longer, releasing only a general statement that stopped short of committing any nations to greater spending unless conditions worsen and urging fiscal responsibility. Read more.
But the presidents and prime ministers gathered in this seaside resort seemed content to delay any major decisions for a while longer, releasing only a general statement that stopped short of committing any nations to greater spending unless conditions worsen and urging fiscal responsibility. Read more.
Jun 19, 2012
Calderón asks G-20 to extend vision beyond borders
La Jornada: Americas Program Original Translation
What one nation currently does affects and impacts the rest, said the Mexican president, who called for a long-term agreement to prevent future crises from occurring.
Jose Antonio Roman.
"We can aspire," he added, "to build a consensus to increase the International Monetary Fund (IMF) response capability, strengthen financial regulation, consolidate forces for regulation and supervision, and also expand banking services to a greater number of people in the world.
He stressed the need to make agreements that design and implement long-term and truly comprehensive measures for the recovery of the economy and the creation of justice.
Calderón said that this meeting was not intended to ignore the current situation in Europe.
“We trust in all of you and your great ability to make agreements and to make a stronger united and integrated Europe. The world must know that the towns and governments of this continent are building the new Europe of the new century.”
What one nation currently does affects and impacts the rest, said the Mexican president, who called for a long-term agreement to prevent future crises from occurring.
Jose Antonio Roman.
Los Cabos, BCS. Upon the opening of the first plenary session of the G-20 Summit, President Felipe Calderón called on all present leaders to look beyond the borders of their countries, to reach agreements and to look out for the good of humanity.
Calderón stressed that in the world we live in today what one country does affects and impacts the rest. He insisted that not only should one solve current problems, but also reach truly comprehensive and well-monitored long-term agreements in order to prevent new crises.
Before the leaders of the G-20, the Mexican president acknowledged that the world faces a "grave economic crisis", which requires them to make a major effort to restore economic stability and create the jobs demanded by citizens in each of their nations.
In his close to 12 minute speech, Calderón emphasized that the leaders gathered there that day had an enormous responsibility and that the world’s eyes were upon them. “We represent,” he said, “more than 80 percent of world trade and, if you include all of the European Union, we represent 90 percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), in addition to two-thirds of the world’s population.”
Calderón said the solution to the current economic crisis requires strengthening the international financial institutions to prevent future crises.
Calderón stressed that in the world we live in today what one country does affects and impacts the rest. He insisted that not only should one solve current problems, but also reach truly comprehensive and well-monitored long-term agreements in order to prevent new crises.
Before the leaders of the G-20, the Mexican president acknowledged that the world faces a "grave economic crisis", which requires them to make a major effort to restore economic stability and create the jobs demanded by citizens in each of their nations.
In his close to 12 minute speech, Calderón emphasized that the leaders gathered there that day had an enormous responsibility and that the world’s eyes were upon them. “We represent,” he said, “more than 80 percent of world trade and, if you include all of the European Union, we represent 90 percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), in addition to two-thirds of the world’s population.”
Calderón said the solution to the current economic crisis requires strengthening the international financial institutions to prevent future crises.
"We can aspire," he added, "to build a consensus to increase the International Monetary Fund (IMF) response capability, strengthen financial regulation, consolidate forces for regulation and supervision, and also expand banking services to a greater number of people in the world.
He stressed the need to make agreements that design and implement long-term and truly comprehensive measures for the recovery of the economy and the creation of justice.
Calderón said that this meeting was not intended to ignore the current situation in Europe.
“We trust in all of you and your great ability to make agreements and to make a stronger united and integrated Europe. The world must know that the towns and governments of this continent are building the new Europe of the new century.”
Nevertheless, President Calderón asked the attendees to adopt specific measures to strengthen institutions, not only on this occasion, but for the long-term.
See Spanish Original.
Translation by Sarah Brady, Americas Program
See Spanish Original.
Translation by Sarah Brady, Americas Program
Feb 16, 2012
Laura's Blog: Mexico at the Helm of the G20
In a few days Hillary Clinton will land on the sunny shores of the Mexican Pacific Ocean to take part in an unusual meeting of foreign ministers. Los Cabos is hosting the ministers of G20 countries, plus a few selected guests, as part of the run-up to the G20 summit to be held in the same peninsular beach resort in June. Mexico took over the presidency of the G20 last December.
The meeting is unusual because foreign minister meetings don't normally form part of the Group of 20 process. But the Mexican government seems to have decided on a strategy of multiple and frequent preparatory meetings as the best guarantee for a successful summit--at a time when the odds against that happening are particularly high.
The G20, with 19 countries and the European Union, claims to represent 90% of global GDP, 80% of international global trade and 64% of the world’s population. It started as a meeting of finance ministers talking about global financial governance and economic policy. Then it morphed into an informal organization with presidential participation that grapples with the world's most pressing issues in a 'members-only club' setting.
The foreign ministers are meeting in part because the G20 is experiencing mission creep at precisely the time when it finds it most difficult to deal with the issues it already has. Because of the hermetic nature of the organization, it's hard to say what Clinton will be talking about, and we likely won't have a clear idea even after the joint declarations and photo ops come out. Mexico has promised more civil society participation and public information, but as hundreds of people work on the elaboration of documents and proposals, getting details from the outside has been like pulling teeth.
The Mexican government may be regretting its decision to take over the 2012 presidency. In the past few meetings the G20 has been virtually paralyzed by the European economic crisis--without reaching effective solutions and without being able to deal with other issues. Mexico hoped to have the European crisis, and particularly the Greek situation, resolved before it held the summit. Not only has the crisis continued, but it threatens to flare up again in a big way despite the Grecian parliament's acceptance of a deal.
The road to Los Cabos has been strewn with obstacles for the beleaguered powerhouses of the world. Besides the crisis, the division between developed countries and developing countries, which Mexico claims to represent, has been growing. Before going into the obstacles, it's important to ask: Why is Mexico doing this? What does the Calderon government hope to obtain?
Mexico has laid out five priorities:
Since the first priority is practically the sin qua non for the rest, the whole agenda depends on a miracle to a large degree. Calderon stated that the crisis should be resolved before June to make progress on the G20 agenda. His goal is to "resolve the euro crisis, to isolate the effects of the crisis on viable economies, like Italy or Spain and avoid systemic contamination and, of course, to discount the part of the Greek debt that is simply unpayable." Although he offered some specific measures to reach this goal, it is looking more and more impossible, especially given the current strategy of brutal austerity measures. Instead of an end to the economic crisis, at this rate we can expect it to spread into a broader political crisis.
The proposals for reaching the other goals support the current economic system that got us into this mess in the first place. In trade, the Mexican government recommends free trade, no to all forms of protectionism and a blind faith that fixing macroeconomic factors will eventually improve the lives of the population.
Strengthening the financial system and fostering inclusion appears to be understood as instituting vigilance and monitoring mechanisms, with structural reforms and regulation off the table. Inclusion does not mean a fairer distribution of wealth generated, but access to the banking system for the poor.
The core proposal for improving the international financial architecture put forth to date is to increase funds in the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Mexican government officials have stated that this will be a fundamental goal at the meeting. However, to date it has received few echoes as nations struggle to find funds for rescue programs in their own countries. In member nations, such as Brazil and Argentina, enthusiasm is low, to say the least, for running funds through a non-representative and orthodox IMF that continues to heavily condition its loans.
In food security, Mexico will promote an agenda aimed at reducing volatility but without curtailing speculative markets. Calderon has publicly recognized the link between food prices, poverty and hunger, and the role of speculation but so far has not supported calls for ending speculation in basic foods.
Finally, "green development" and climate change should be the hallmarks of the Mexican G20 presidency but here, especially, the chances of success and the approval of energetic measures in these critical areas appears distant. Mexico calls for attacking climate change through market mechanisms including promoting carbon markets, REDD+ and payment for environmental services, without a universally binding system of emissions controls--a necessary idea that was already proven politically dead in the water at the Climate Change Conference that Mexico hosted in December of last year.
Mexican civil society has organized in almost as many groups and sub-groups as the G20, to monitor, influence, critique or protest the official events--depending on who you talk to and what tack they're taking. Getting detailed information on the procedures and content of materials and proposals poses difficulties but the idea is to use the meeting to raise issues that affect real people. The question of the basic legitimacy or lack of legitimacy of the G20 as a forum for making global decisions--due to its lack of clear rules and exclusive membership--as well as its orientation toward the interests of the world's wealthiest and most powerful nations--remains central to strategies.
See also G20 Update
The meeting is unusual because foreign minister meetings don't normally form part of the Group of 20 process. But the Mexican government seems to have decided on a strategy of multiple and frequent preparatory meetings as the best guarantee for a successful summit--at a time when the odds against that happening are particularly high.
The G20, with 19 countries and the European Union, claims to represent 90% of global GDP, 80% of international global trade and 64% of the world’s population. It started as a meeting of finance ministers talking about global financial governance and economic policy. Then it morphed into an informal organization with presidential participation that grapples with the world's most pressing issues in a 'members-only club' setting.
The foreign ministers are meeting in part because the G20 is experiencing mission creep at precisely the time when it finds it most difficult to deal with the issues it already has. Because of the hermetic nature of the organization, it's hard to say what Clinton will be talking about, and we likely won't have a clear idea even after the joint declarations and photo ops come out. Mexico has promised more civil society participation and public information, but as hundreds of people work on the elaboration of documents and proposals, getting details from the outside has been like pulling teeth.
The Mexican government may be regretting its decision to take over the 2012 presidency. In the past few meetings the G20 has been virtually paralyzed by the European economic crisis--without reaching effective solutions and without being able to deal with other issues. Mexico hoped to have the European crisis, and particularly the Greek situation, resolved before it held the summit. Not only has the crisis continued, but it threatens to flare up again in a big way despite the Grecian parliament's acceptance of a deal.
The road to Los Cabos has been strewn with obstacles for the beleaguered powerhouses of the world. Besides the crisis, the division between developed countries and developing countries, which Mexico claims to represent, has been growing. Before going into the obstacles, it's important to ask: Why is Mexico doing this? What does the Calderon government hope to obtain?
Mexico has laid out five priorities:
- Economic stabilization and structural reforms as foundations for growth and employment.
- Strengthening the financial system and fostering financial inclusion to promote economic growth.
- Improving the International Financial Architecture in an interconnected world.
- Enhancing food security and addressing the issue of commodity price volatility.
- Promoting sustainable development, green growth and the fight against climate change.
The proposals for reaching the other goals support the current economic system that got us into this mess in the first place. In trade, the Mexican government recommends free trade, no to all forms of protectionism and a blind faith that fixing macroeconomic factors will eventually improve the lives of the population.
Strengthening the financial system and fostering inclusion appears to be understood as instituting vigilance and monitoring mechanisms, with structural reforms and regulation off the table. Inclusion does not mean a fairer distribution of wealth generated, but access to the banking system for the poor.
The core proposal for improving the international financial architecture put forth to date is to increase funds in the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Mexican government officials have stated that this will be a fundamental goal at the meeting. However, to date it has received few echoes as nations struggle to find funds for rescue programs in their own countries. In member nations, such as Brazil and Argentina, enthusiasm is low, to say the least, for running funds through a non-representative and orthodox IMF that continues to heavily condition its loans.
In food security, Mexico will promote an agenda aimed at reducing volatility but without curtailing speculative markets. Calderon has publicly recognized the link between food prices, poverty and hunger, and the role of speculation but so far has not supported calls for ending speculation in basic foods.
Finally, "green development" and climate change should be the hallmarks of the Mexican G20 presidency but here, especially, the chances of success and the approval of energetic measures in these critical areas appears distant. Mexico calls for attacking climate change through market mechanisms including promoting carbon markets, REDD+ and payment for environmental services, without a universally binding system of emissions controls--a necessary idea that was already proven politically dead in the water at the Climate Change Conference that Mexico hosted in December of last year.
Mexican civil society has organized in almost as many groups and sub-groups as the G20, to monitor, influence, critique or protest the official events--depending on who you talk to and what tack they're taking. Getting detailed information on the procedures and content of materials and proposals poses difficulties but the idea is to use the meeting to raise issues that affect real people. The question of the basic legitimacy or lack of legitimacy of the G20 as a forum for making global decisions--due to its lack of clear rules and exclusive membership--as well as its orientation toward the interests of the world's wealthiest and most powerful nations--remains central to strategies.
See also G20 Update
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)